Actualité

(TR14) (INCYBER) Capture devices



Firmly in the realm of fantasy fiction for most people, “spyware” has in fact become the only possible tool available to government agencies when communication encryption masks key elements of their investigations. However, the Pegasus scandal highlighted the extremely negative impact of this type of software when used without safeguards. A specially constituted committee of the European Parliament recently set out to assess the risks of using spyware and subsequently issued a series of recommendations to the European Commission. But what role should member states play in this debate? Should they take up the issue
and contribute to the EU initiative—risking a tightening up of the rules governing the use of capture—
or should they adopt a more cautious stance, emphasizing the need for “national security”, synonymous with the status quo? Could cross-disciplinary work (vulnerability researchers, telecoms security specialists, systems engineers, etc.) define an effective system that also safeguards privacy?

Allez à la source

artia13

Depuis 1998, je poursuis une introspection constante qui m’a conduit à analyser les mécanismes de l’information, de la manipulation et du pouvoir symbolique. Mon engagement est clair : défendre la vérité, outiller les citoyens, et sécuriser les espaces numériques. Spécialiste en analyse des médias, en enquêtes sensibles et en cybersécurité, je mets mes compétences au service de projets éducatifs et sociaux, via l’association Artia13. On me décrit comme quelqu’un de méthodique, engagé, intuitif et lucide. Je crois profondément qu’une société informée est une société plus libre.

artia13 has 4850 posts and counting. See all posts by artia13